Logo
PARTICIPANTS
SCHEDULE
REPORTS
MAILING LIST
HACKERS' GUIDE
HOME
 

C. A. Stewart

On the formulae-as-types correspondence for classical logic

PhD thesis, Oxford University, 2000


The Curry-Howard correspondence states the equivalence between the constructions implicit in intuitionistic logic and those described in the simply-typed lambda-calculus. It is an insight of great importance in theoretical computer science, and is fundamental in modern approaches to constructive type theory. The possibility of a similar formulae-as-types correspondence for classical logic looks to be a seminal development in this area, but whilst promising results have been achieved, there does not appear to be much agreement of what is at stake in claiming that such a correspondence exists. Consequently much work in this area suffers from several weaknesses; in particular the status of the new rules needed to describe the distinctively classical inferences is unclear. We show how to situate the formulae-as-types correspondence within the proof-theoretic account of logical semantics arising from the work of Michael Dummett and Dag Prawitz, and demonstrate that the admissibility of Prawitz's inversion principle, which we argue should be strengthened, is essential to the good behaviour of intuitionistic logic. By regarding the rules which determine the deductive strength of classical logic as structural rules, as opposed to the logical rules associated with specific logical connectives, we extend Prawitz's inversion principle to classical propositional logic, formulated in a theory of Parigot's lambda-mu calculus with eta expansions. We then provide a classical analogue of a subsystem of Martin-Löf's type theory corresponding to Peano Arithmetic and show its soundness, appealing to an extension of Tait's reducibility method. Our treatment is the first treatment of induction in classical arithmetic that truly falls under the aegis of the formulae-as-types correspondence, as it is the first that is consistent with the intensional reading of propositional equality.


[ bib | .pdf | .ps | http ]

Back


This file has been generated by bibtex2html 1.61

Copyright notice: The documents contained in these pages are included by the contributing authors as a means to ensure timely dissemination of scholarly and technical work on a non-commercial basis. Copyright and all rights therein are maintained by the authors or by other copyright holders, notwithstanding that they have offered their works here electronically. It is understood that all persons copying this information will adhere to the terms and constraints invoked by each author's copyright. These works may not be reposted without the explicit permission of the copyright holder.

If you experience problems downloading any of the files above, it is most likely because your browser does not handle compressed files correctly.

In particular, Netscape might save the file in the compressed gz-format with extension .ps or .pdf (indicating postscript or PDF, resp.). You can work around this by saving the file, renaming it to .ps.gz or .pdf.gz, and then uncrompress it.
 

This page is maintained by Peter Møller Neergaard. Autogenerated on Saturday July 26 2008.